Announced in May 15, 2007, Radeon HD 2600XT points finally the end of its nose and thus buckles the arrival of the first ranges DirectX 10 of AMD and Nvidia. How are those cards? AMD manages it to do better than Nvidia with GeForce 8600 The disadvantage f
Game test and results
For this test, we used Windows Vista and 6 plays. All the tests were carried out in 1280x1024, since it is about the basic resolution of the screens of today. Whereas we test the top-of-the-range graphics cards with graphic details high to see ultra high, we tested here in high quality mode and average quality mode. But true disappointment comes from the performances with antialiasing which are relATively bad. To play in 1280x1024 with modern plays, the current medium of range will be shown often too right if one wants to benefit from the last effects. It will thus be necessary often to make compromises and to turn to a chart such as GeForce 8600 GTS.
ATi HD 2600 integrate the UVD, an engine dedicated to the decoding of the movie which completely supports the decompression of the H.264 formats and VC-1 with the flows maxima authorized by the HD-DVD and Bluray. Capacities similar to those introduced by Nvidia with GeForce 8600GT with a difference; Nvidia does not manage that partially decoding VC-1.the CPU uses to read a file in hd slightly higher with the nvidia, well it remains weak.
|
ATI |
NVIDIA |
|
H.264 we can open hardware accelerate
| |
|
VC-1 we can not open hardware accelerate | |
更多精彩的最新配件资讯，请点击进入硬件中心！
大家如果对本栏目有任何建议、意见或任何IT配件资讯的投稿，我们会尽快给予回复。最后，硬件频道全体同仁感谢大家对PChome一贯的关注和支持！
网友评论